Skip Navigation: Go to Page Content MU Home MU Office of the Provost
Information For
Deans
Chairs
Faculty
Students

Information About
Academic Integrity
Academic Positions
Accreditation (Institutional)
Administrative Speakers Bureau
Assessment
Award Programs
Commencement
Environmental Scan
Faculty Council
Faculty Development
General Education Program
Intellectual Pluralism
Promotion and Tenure
Mizzou Advantage
Undergraduate Certificates
Undergraduate Emphasis Areas
Undergraduate Minors

Resources
Academic Calendars
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
Academic Dates & Deadlines
Religious Holidays
Academic Hiring Forms
Academic Policies
Business Policies
Collected Rules/Regulations
Faculty Handbook

Provost Areas
Who Does What
Provost's Staff
Staff Directory
Administrative Services
MU Budget Office
Community College Partnerships
Deputy Provost
Economic Development
Enrollment Management
The Graduate School
Information Technology
International Programs
Office of Research
Student Affairs
Office of Student Rights and Responsibilities
Undergraduate Studies
University of Missouri Extension
Schools and Colleges
Other Reporting Units
Committees
   
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Contact Us | FAQs | Home


Environmental Scan

Task Force Members

Preliminary List of Issues by Category

Minutes of January 30, 2007 Task Force Meeting
Minutes of February 22, 2007 Task Force Meeting

Charge

MU exists in an extraordinarily complicated and volatile environment, as do all major research universities. Our mission is very complex; our stakeholders are varied, posing very different, even contradictory, demands on the University. Not only do the many different elements of the environment change continuously, but entirely new dimensions emerge from time to time. For these reasons, the environmental scan cannot be done in an entirely structured, "by the numbers" way, but must draw on the collective knowledge of a variety of people with particular knowledge bases and interests, including areas as diverse as federal science and science-funding policies, the state political dynamics, the changing legal and regulatory environment, economic and demographic conditions, security issues, disciplinary developments, and changes in the broad world of higher education .

The outcome of the process should include:

  • A statement/paper that describes the environment and identifies significant issues,
  • A summary of the last environmental scan and a statement of the major differences as compared to the current Scan,
  • An assessment of major trends,
  • Identification of major threats and opportunities,
  • In an appendix, recommendations about a set of "dashboard" measures that can be used to continuously monitor key elements of the environment,
  • A discussion of the dimensions of the scan - a preliminary list to start this discussion may include
    • Economy
    • Political Climate - in the state, nation, and world, research funding, re-authorization (Spellings Commission)
    • Competition - local, state, out of state, national, rankings, for profit and near for profit, non-traditional, emerging competitors
    • Demographics (decline in college age population)
    • Faculty Issues - age, turnover, retirements, compensation, benefits
    • Mission creep

The Task Force is charged to use a process that includes the following.

Fall 2006

  • Recommend the major dimensions of the environment for purposes of organizing the study and collecting data,
  • Discuss guidelines for getting expert input on each dimension.
Winter/Early Spring 2007
  • Seek input for each dimension from interested and informed stakeholders,
  • Using the background input, discuss an outline for the scan.
Spring/Summer 2007
  • Write the Environmental Scan document (perhaps 20 pages); to be done by Provost's Staff,
  • Recommend the final document to SPRAC and to the Provost and Chancellor by May 1, 2007.

MU
MU